Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + + +
Jpatt, sorry, but I must disagree
::::I think it has been established to discuss the side effects upon children under 8-yrs. olds, their skulls are thinner, the radiation penetrates deeper into their brains, nervous system effects. [http://environment.about.com/b/2009/03/17/study-finds-cell-phones-increase-brain-cancer-risks-in-children.htm] The NIH concludes no studies completed on children [http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellphones] --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:12, 23 February 2010 (EST)
::::I think it has been established to discuss the side effects upon children under 8-yrs. olds, their skulls are thinner, the radiation penetrates deeper into their brains, nervous system effects. [http://environment.about.com/b/2009/03/17/study-finds-cell-phones-increase-brain-cancer-risks-in-children.htm] The NIH concludes no studies completed on children [http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellphones] --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:12, 23 February 2010 (EST)
Sigh. Jpatt, I love ya, but that is the Swedish study which no other group has been able to replicate. Try to dig a little deeper and get at the science of it. Cell phones use radio waves. Radio waves are not [[ionizing radiation]], hence they have no way to cause DNA mutations.
Radio has been in use for around a century. All radio (or radar) can do to living tissue is heat it up (which is how the microwave oven works). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:01, 23 February 2010 (EST)