| Line 62: |
Line 62: |
| | There are two primary motivations for the [[liberal]] advocacy by pseudo-intellectuals: | | There are two primary motivations for the [[liberal]] advocacy by pseudo-intellectuals: |
| | | | |
| − | * it is easier for them to obtain acclaim from the liberal press than from real intellectuals | + | * it is easier for them to obtain acclaim from real intellectuals |
| | | | |
| − | * they genuinely fail to understand certain abstractions, such as: | + | * they genuinely understand certain abstractions, such as: |
| | | | |
| | :* how cutting taxes often increases government revenue ([[Laffer Curve]]) | | :* how cutting taxes often increases government revenue ([[Laffer Curve]]) |
| Line 73: |
Line 73: |
| | :* how arms limitations treaties always helps a dishonest adversary | | :* how arms limitations treaties always helps a dishonest adversary |
| | | | |
| − | * they expect superficial, flawed logic to persuade others, such as: | + | * they try to reason with others to persuade others, such as: |
| | | | |
| − | :* claiming that inequality in outcome implies discrimination | + | :* Showing that inequality in outcome implies discrimination |
| − | :* demanding equal treatment for genders in all situations | + | :* Demanding equal treatment for genders in all situations |
| − | :* claiming that the [[gay agenda]] is like the civil rights struggle by African Americans | + | :* Proving that the gay rights is like the civil rights struggle by African Americans |
| − | :* insisting that government can reduce poverty with more programs | + | :* Showing that government can reduce poverty with more programs |
| | | | |
| | Please add to these lists. | | Please add to these lists. |