Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + + +
Does anyone second the motion?
:Hmm, I don't think I want to get involved. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:00, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
:Hmm, I don't think I want to get involved. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:00, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
::Agreed. The template was used and created and used by two sysops (from what I can see), but apparently, that's not good enough. The sideline is the place to be right now. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 22:05, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
::Agreed. The template was used and created and used by two sysops (from what I can see), but apparently, that's not good enough. The sideline is the place to be right now. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 22:05, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
I spoke to TK about it, and here's how we left it. He has no objection to the idea of the template. It's just its sudden appearance, coupled with the marking of his archived talk page.
If anybody other than me thinks it is a good idea to use these templates, please suggest it at [[user talk:Aschlafly]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:44, 31 March 2007 (EDT)