30
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − Line 5:
Line 4: +
Talk:National Organization for Marriage (view source)
Revision as of 22:47, May 5, 2010
, 22:47, May 5, 2010no edit summary
== Why were my changes reverted? ==
== Why were my changes reverted? ==
:Until modern times, there was never a distinction to what 'marriage' consisted of. In keeping with that logical tradition, marriage does not mean between two men even if the state says homosexual marriage exists. The state may call an abomination whatever it pleases. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 18:42, 5 May 2010 (EDT)
:Until modern times, there was never a distinction to what 'marriage' consisted of. In keeping with that logical tradition, marriage does not mean between two men even if the state says homosexual marriage exists. The state may call an abomination whatever it pleases. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 18:42, 5 May 2010 (EDT)
::I would think that it was because of your clever wiki-lawyering, parsing the article to remove the main purpose of the organization, which is to defend heterosexual marriage, not all kinds of "marriage" as defined by liberals. If you wish to be clever and be a pretend lawyer, try Wikipedia. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:43, 5 May 2010 (EDT)
::I would think that it was because of your clever wiki-lawyering, parsing the article to remove the main purpose of the organization, which is to defend heterosexual marriage, not all kinds of "marriage" as defined by liberals. If you wish to be clever and be a pretend lawyer, try Wikipedia. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:43, 5 May 2010 (EDT)
:::See? TK agrees with me. The organization's purpose is to protect ''heterosexual'' marriage. [[User:CChance|CChance]] 18:47, 5 May 2010 (EDT)