Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 49:
Line 49: + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to an Old Earth (view source)
Revision as of 15:10, May 11, 2010
, 15:10, May 11, 2010This is an historical distortion, and unhelpful to an open-minded discussion even if were true
So, how do the examples fit in?
So, how do the examples fit in?
: Frank, the style of your remarks reflect a lack of an open mind towards this issue. You state, "Since the 18th century, scientist[s] are convinced ... over long periods of time." This is an historical distortion, and unhelpful to an open-minded discussion even if were true.
: I welcome open-minded discussions, but closed-minded discussions are often a waste of time. So please show some signs of an open mind about this first. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:10, 11 May 2010 (EDT)
=== The continued existence of fragile natural arches without having collapsed a short time period for erosion and stresses on them ===
=== The continued existence of fragile natural arches without having collapsed a short time period for erosion and stresses on them ===