Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 329:
Line 329: − − Why is this so hard to understand? − − − == WHY IS THIS SO DIFFICULT TO GRASP? == − − ---- − Guns kill people, people use guns to kill people, the availability of guns makes it easier to kill people. Why then is gun control a bad thing. If someone cannot get a gun, they cannot use a gun. With so many firearms around it is easy for a criminal to buy, steal, or "borrow" a gun to commit their crimes. Gun control works, look at Canada, Australia, and England. If one takes away the handguns that are used exclusively for crime or killing people and not hunting, the crime rate must go down. Hunting rifles are fine, just the pistols, assault rifles, SMGs that have no other use than killing people need to be taken away. As for the second amendment, It is a relic from a bygone age that should be removed.
Reverted edits by RealPerson (Talk) to last revision by Aschlafly
:: I find your comment odd from someone who has not had a prior edit on this site in over a year. If you post something substantive then I would be happy to respond, but I'm not optimistic that you will.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:27, 7 June 2010 (EDT)
:: I find your comment odd from someone who has not had a prior edit on this site in over a year. If you post something substantive then I would be happy to respond, but I'm not optimistic that you will.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:27, 7 June 2010 (EDT)