Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 56: Line 56:     
::: Sure, "significance" is subjective, but so is the officiating in the World Cup.  It seems to me that a ranking based on significance, albeit somewhat subjective, is better than mixing the obscure with the profound.  But I have an open mind about this.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:03, 14 June 2010 (EDT)
 
::: Sure, "significance" is subjective, but so is the officiating in the World Cup.  It seems to me that a ranking based on significance, albeit somewhat subjective, is better than mixing the obscure with the profound.  But I have an open mind about this.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:03, 14 June 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::: I'm not arguing that we could rank based on significance, just that it could be very messy. If you have an idea in mind for how to measure the significance, please post it! My only problem is that trying to rank by significance without providing a definition of significance will probably just lead to a ton of unproductive argument. [[User:EMorris|EMorris]] 16:10, 14 June 2010 (EDT)

Navigation menu