10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 297:
Line 297: + + + + +
no edit summary
==Uniquely Christian==
==Uniquely Christian==
I'm not sure I would agree that faith is uniquely Christian, but even if that's true you may want to invest in a thesaurus. It looks kind of silly to use the same phrase that many times in an article.--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 13:58, 5 January 2009 (EST)
I'm not sure I would agree that faith is uniquely Christian, but even if that's true you may want to invest in a thesaurus. It looks kind of silly to use the same phrase that many times in an article.--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 13:58, 5 January 2009 (EST)
== a case of selection bias perhaps? ==
I can see it has already been discussed, but nothing has yet been done about it. Regular Conservapedia contributors have pointed this out, so it's not just liberal rants I'm talking about. I will quote Mr. Schlafly (from this talk page): ''"You seem to be using "faith" as a synonym for "belief". They are different concepts."''; this seems very reasonable to me, I doubt anyone would argue with that. However, there seems to be a major problem, which is that the article is '''a redirect from the word "belief", effectively treating the words as synonyms'''. Could someone address this? Even those who are addressed in this very article as "non-believers" (I guess this possibly refers to non-Christians) most certainly have a belief system, let it be astrology, communism or new-age <s>nonsense</s> spirituality.
''I have not yet contributed much, as I'm afraid anything will get me permabanned (again), so I will discuss in talk pages before editing, if that makes sense.'' --[[User:Relative|Relative]] 13:47, 15 June 2010 (EDT)