Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
300 bytes added ,  17:53, June 15, 2010
no edit summary
Line 302: Line 302:  
I can see it has already been discussed, but nothing has yet been done about it. Regular Conservapedia contributors have pointed this out, so it's not just liberal rants I'm talking about. I will quote Mr. Schlafly (from this talk page): ''"You seem to be using "faith" as a synonym for "belief".  They are different concepts."''; this seems very reasonable to me, I doubt anyone would argue with that. However, there seems to be a major problem, which is that the article is '''a redirect from the word "belief", effectively treating the words as synonyms'''. Could someone address this? Even those who are addressed in this very article as "non-believers" (I guess this possibly refers to non-Christians) most certainly have a belief system, let it be astrology, communism or new-age <s>nonsense</s> spirituality.  
 
I can see it has already been discussed, but nothing has yet been done about it. Regular Conservapedia contributors have pointed this out, so it's not just liberal rants I'm talking about. I will quote Mr. Schlafly (from this talk page): ''"You seem to be using "faith" as a synonym for "belief".  They are different concepts."''; this seems very reasonable to me, I doubt anyone would argue with that. However, there seems to be a major problem, which is that the article is '''a redirect from the word "belief", effectively treating the words as synonyms'''. Could someone address this? Even those who are addressed in this very article as "non-believers" (I guess this possibly refers to non-Christians) most certainly have a belief system, let it be astrology, communism or new-age <s>nonsense</s> spirituality.  
 
''I have not yet contributed much, as I'm afraid anything will get me permabanned (again), so I will discuss in talk pages before editing, if that makes sense.'' --[[User:Relative|Relative]] 13:47, 15 June 2010 (EDT)
 
''I have not yet contributed much, as I'm afraid anything will get me permabanned (again), so I will discuss in talk pages before editing, if that makes sense.'' --[[User:Relative|Relative]] 13:47, 15 June 2010 (EDT)
 +
P.S. I'm not at all concerned about the fact that the article describes Christian Faith, as one would surely expect of an American conservative encyclopaedia, but maybe there should be some sort of "disclaimer" that states it clearly at the top --[[User:Relative|Relative]] 13:53, 15 June 2010 (EDT)
10

edits

Navigation menu