Changes

:Thanks! It makes sense. Perhaps another section should be created to provide an overall outcome as a result of [[Climategate]], such as the necessary requirement that "[[Global warming]], to be accepted as a scientific hypothesis, it must include details of how to prove it wrong--'[[falsifiability]].'" I really hope the climate science community has learned from this (unfortunately politics and science are still holding hands, which is another clear need to change), so the article makes a great point. I'll look into this more when I return. Until then - Marry Christmas! [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 17:40, 23 December 2009 (EST)

:Thanks! It makes sense. Perhaps another section should be created to provide an overall outcome as a result of [[Climategate]], such as the necessary requirement that "[[Global warming]], to be accepted as a scientific hypothesis, it must include details of how to prove it wrong--'[[falsifiability]].'" I really hope the climate science community has learned from this (unfortunately politics and science are still holding hands, which is another clear need to change), so the article makes a great point. I'll look into this more when I return. Until then - Marry Christmas! [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 17:40, 23 December 2009 (EST)

===Amazongate===

== Amazongate ==

A climategate and then a glaciergate and now an Amazongate.  http://www.australianclimatemadness.com/?p=2956  

A climategate and then a glaciergate and now an Amazongate.  http://www.australianclimatemadness.com/?p=2956