Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
312 bytes added ,  20:18, July 25, 2010
I did some spot-checking and found confirmation for every name I checked
Line 15: Line 15:     
::::I didn't count the names in the article before I replaced the list. I just assumed the "65" mentioned at the top of the list was correct, and I had more names than that. -- [[User:JohnWBarber|JohnWBarber]] 09:54, 25 July 2010 (EDT)
 
::::I didn't count the names in the article before I replaced the list. I just assumed the "65" mentioned at the top of the list was correct, and I had more names than that. -- [[User:JohnWBarber|JohnWBarber]] 09:54, 25 July 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::: It's a long list.  I did some spot-checking and found confirmation for every name I checked.  But perhaps some further review would also be helpful.  Do you feel the citations in the table back up the inclusion of every single name on the list?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:18, 25 July 2010 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,203

edits

Navigation menu