1,767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 39:
Line 39: − +
→Unlock and revert - PLEASE.
*Sid, you wrote above: "As such, I reverted the article. TK, if you wish to revert, you better post a VERY good explanation here. I think that the potential link to religion should be covered, but it should be done in a neutral way..." Get over yourself! This site will never show religion in a neutral way. Its whole reason for being is because most other sites do that, or worse, fail to include religion at all, unless in a negative light, so why would you be suggesting we do that here? The page is Morality. Without God in the equation, how does one lead a moral life? The very idea is an oxymoron. I repeat my observation of yesterday; I think you really need to examine why you are here, since it is quite obvious you want this place to be a clone of Wikipedia. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 06:17, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
*Sid, you wrote above: "As such, I reverted the article. TK, if you wish to revert, you better post a VERY good explanation here. I think that the potential link to religion should be covered, but it should be done in a neutral way..." Get over yourself! This site will never show religion in a neutral way. Its whole reason for being is because most other sites do that, or worse, fail to include religion at all, unless in a negative light, so why would you be suggesting we do that here? The page is Morality. Without God in the equation, how does one lead a moral life? The very idea is an oxymoron. I repeat my observation of yesterday; I think you really need to examine why you are here, since it is quite obvious you want this place to be a clone of Wikipedia. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 06:17, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::Yes, I want it to be a clone of Wikipedia in the sense that not every news outlet on the PLANET laughs about it.
::Yes, I want it to be a clone of Wikipedia in the sense that not every news outlet on the PLANET laughs about it.
::Your post shows exactly why I asked for neutrality. You say "There is no morality without religion, so there is no morality without religion". Nothing about the study with primates (which you completely eradicated with your edits)?
::Your post shows exactly why I asked for neutrality. You say "There is no morality without religion, so there is no morality without religion". Nothing about the study with primates (which you completely eradicated with your edits) or any other possible point of view?
::You simply assert that your point of view is right and then supply sources that speak for your point of view. Congratulations, you turned into Conservative. Just with less Bible-quoting and more copyright violation. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 06:24, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::You simply assert that your point of view is right and then supply sources that speak for your point of view. Congratulations, you turned into Conservative. Just with less Bible-quoting and more copyright violation. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 06:24, 2 April 2007 (EDT)