nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 41:
Line 41: + +
→Unlock and revert - PLEASE.
::Your post shows exactly why I asked for neutrality. You say "There is no morality without religion, so there is no morality without religion". Nothing about the study with primates (which you completely eradicated with your edits) or any other possible point of view?
::Your post shows exactly why I asked for neutrality. You say "There is no morality without religion, so there is no morality without religion". Nothing about the study with primates (which you completely eradicated with your edits) or any other possible point of view?
::You simply assert that your point of view is right and then supply sources that speak for your point of view. Congratulations, you turned into Conservative. Just with less Bible-quoting and more copyright violation. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 06:24, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::You simply assert that your point of view is right and then supply sources that speak for your point of view. Congratulations, you turned into Conservative. Just with less Bible-quoting and more copyright violation. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 06:24, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
*ROFL! Look up "enfant terrible" in the dictionary. The writer gave his permission. It wasn't even copyrighted, so therefore there can by no violation of copyright. You keep repeating like, like Herr Gobles, thinking if done enough, people will believe it. You have turned into a wiki-nazi. Get over yourself. You have no right to demand explanations from anyone. You should care not one wit what liberals and secular-progressives think of this place, I don't. Neither does Andy. It is because of them this place was started. You were neither appointed or elected to try and make it different. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 07:09, 2 April 2007 (EDT)