Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + +
Conservapedia talk:Neutrality (view source)
Revision as of 23:07, April 2, 2007
, 23:07, April 2, 2007to Mtur
: If it is not neutral, could it at least declare which way its bias is leaning? American conservative (social? economic?) with a inerrant biblical standing. This was a criticism of wikipedia, and if it is not corrected here then this site cannot be any better than the site that is criticized. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 18:52, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
: If it is not neutral, could it at least declare which way its bias is leaning? American conservative (social? economic?) with a inerrant biblical standing. This was a criticism of wikipedia, and if it is not corrected here then this site cannot be any better than the site that is criticized. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 18:52, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::You tell me, I'm not senior staff. Just a newly minted first-level supervisor. It's in favor of American English and is certainly being "nice" to YECism. Can you point to an article which endorses the inerrency of the Bible? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 19:07, 2 April 2007 (EDT)