1,129
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + +
Conservapedia talk:Neutrality (view source)
Revision as of 23:17, April 2, 2007
, 23:17, April 2, 2007biblical inerrancy
::You tell me, I'm not senior staff. Just a newly minted first-level supervisor. It's in favor of American English and is certainly being "nice" to YECism. Can you point to an article which endorses the inerrency of the Bible? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 19:07, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::You tell me, I'm not senior staff. Just a newly minted first-level supervisor. It's in favor of American English and is certainly being "nice" to YECism. Can you point to an article which endorses the inerrency of the Bible? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 19:07, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::: One need only look for conservative's edits. Every time he links to AiG it is about the truth is in the Bible and any science that contradicts that is wrong. I bet you can't do an article on [[radiocarbon dating]] with sources from[http://www.c14dating.com/] [http://science.howstuffworks.com/carbon-14.htm] [http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/raddat2.html] without getting some AiG references that claim those methods are wrong because they give a date older than 4004 BC. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 19:17, 2 April 2007 (EDT)