6
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,111:
Line 1,111: + + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 23:46, October 19, 2010
, 23:46, October 19, 2010no edit summary
counter example 12, referring to the W13 magnetar does have an explanation that, while not proven, or provable, is at least consistent with relativity. It is explained here http://www.astronomynow.com/news/n1008/20magnetar/ one possible way it could have formed. [[User:Vikten|Vikten]] 16:38, 18 October 2010 (EDT)
counter example 12, referring to the W13 magnetar does have an explanation that, while not proven, or provable, is at least consistent with relativity. It is explained here http://www.astronomynow.com/news/n1008/20magnetar/ one possible way it could have formed. [[User:Vikten|Vikten]] 16:38, 18 October 2010 (EDT)
== Tachyons ==
Not sure if this belongs here, but Tachyons seem to violate relativity, (while they do fit the math, strictly) They are quite confusing, and even under the most scientifically liberal interpretations, these hypothetical particles are somewhat self contradictory.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/tachyons.html[[User:Vikten|Vikten]] 19:46, 19 October 2010 (EDT)