Changes

::If the article had, say: given the titles of Orr's books; and mentioned a single source, such as a print biography, for the facts in the article; or quoted a reasonable published source giving the title of one of Orr's hymns and a comment about its being familiar or beloved or anything like that, I don't think it would have been deleted.

::If the article had, say: given the titles of Orr's books; and mentioned a single source, such as a print biography, for the facts in the article; or quoted a reasonable published source giving the title of one of Orr's hymns and a comment about its being familiar or beloved or anything like that, I don't think it would have been deleted.

::It was a case of someone borderline-notable, probably notable for a Wikipedia article, whose article was deleted because the contributor didn't create a very good article and apparently didn't take any actions to defend it other than just blindly recreating the same very short article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:24, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

::This wasn't a case of anti-Christian bias, It was a case of someone borderline-notable, probably notable enough for a Wikipedia article, whose article was deleted because the contributor didn't create a very good article and apparently didn't take any actions to defend it other than just blindly recreating the same very short article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:24, 3 April 2007 (EDT)