nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 645:
Line 645: + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 10:38, April 3, 2007
, 10:38, April 3, 2007→Deletion of article about a Christian missionary: Half agree
::This wasn't a case of anti-Christian bias, It was a case of someone borderline-notable, probably notable enough for a Wikipedia article, whose article was deleted because the contributor didn't create a very good article and apparently didn't take any actions to defend it other than just blindly recreating the same very short article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:24, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::This wasn't a case of anti-Christian bias, It was a case of someone borderline-notable, probably notable enough for a Wikipedia article, whose article was deleted because the contributor didn't create a very good article and apparently didn't take any actions to defend it other than just blindly recreating the same very short article. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:24, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Hey, that's not fair! Being able to see what the deleted article had gives you the advantage over me. :-)
:::Seriously, I think that my comments about the liberal leanings of Wikipedia editors is still correct (and I disagree that Orr is "borderline-notable", in reality). But I also concede that this is not a good example to criticise Wikipedia over.
:::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:38, 3 April 2007 (EDT)