152
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: +
→"that involves the killing and cloning of human embryos"
The passage "that involves the killing and cloning of human embryos" has been removed with [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Howard_Stern&curid=7381&diff=82511&oldid=82490 this edit] (which is marked as minor - but isn't). Does anyone have anything to back this up either way? The removal of this phrase significantly changes what is said when it comes to stem cell research. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 21:15, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
The passage "that involves the killing and cloning of human embryos" has been removed with [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Howard_Stern&curid=7381&diff=82511&oldid=82490 this edit] (which is marked as minor - but isn't). Does anyone have anything to back this up either way? The removal of this phrase significantly changes what is said when it comes to stem cell research. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 21:15, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
*Listen to his show! That's what he supports! -- [[User:CoulterMan|CoulterMan]] 08:43, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
*Listen to his show! That's what he supports! -- [[User:CoulterMan|CoulterMan]] 08:43, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
:Nobody's challenging that that he supports embryonic stem cell research, but unless stern himself has said, directly, that he supports embryo-killing, then its not necessary to say it. Unless you can say "Stern has said that he supports 'the killing and cloning of human embryos'" as a direct quote from him then its completely unnecessary to describe it in imflammatory language just for your own petty need to frame the debate however you like. Grow up about this, and realize that nobody in fact wants to hear you editorialize, especially when it takes the article away from its subject matter (Stern) into where you want to go just to vent (Moore and Stem Cells, frinstance).