239
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 116:
Line 116: + + + +
→This is supposed to be about the Book of Genesis
:::I've seen too many edits from people doing their best to discredit the Bible, but all they have is opinion, and not science. The "letters" theory within the "Authorship" subheading is the only one allowed here, as it is this theory that nearly all debunkers have claimed as evidence against Genesis; this theory was also thoroughly debunked as being the opinions of the men who postulated it. They had no hard evidence backing up their claims. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:00, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
:::I've seen too many edits from people doing their best to discredit the Bible, but all they have is opinion, and not science. The "letters" theory within the "Authorship" subheading is the only one allowed here, as it is this theory that nearly all debunkers have claimed as evidence against Genesis; this theory was also thoroughly debunked as being the opinions of the men who postulated it. They had no hard evidence backing up their claims. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:00, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
::::What precisely is your definition of science?
::::The "letters theory"? You mean the Documentary Hypothesis? Not really debunked, just changed 'round a bit. ''Real'' bible scholars know that the bible was written by several authors with several purposes. [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 17:43, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
:::It can't reflect ''all'' the research; it has to be selective and only reflect the most relevant and accurate research. Of course there will still be disputes about what qualifies, but a lot of the "research" is not worth including. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:30, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
:::It can't reflect ''all'' the research; it has to be selective and only reflect the most relevant and accurate research. Of course there will still be disputes about what qualifies, but a lot of the "research" is not worth including. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:30, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Why? Which research is not acceptable? Is research from apologists acceptable? [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 17:43, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
== The Fourth Day ==
== The Fourth Day ==