Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  03:48, March 17, 2011
Line 3: Line 3:     
== Evidence against [[Evolution]] ==
 
== Evidence against [[Evolution]] ==
The skull of the woodpecker is uniquely suited to absorb the intense shocks generated by its feeding habits. If the skull was weaker at some point in the past, the bird could not have fed in such a manner. But if the bird didn't feed in such a manner, then why would it have 'evolved' a thicker skull<ref>http://creation.com/stuart-burgess-interview-biomimetics</ref>? [[Liberals]] can't answer questions like this, which is why they resort to silencing the opposition with harassment and vandalism!
+
The skull of the woodpecker is uniquely suited to absorb the intense shocks generated by its feeding habits. If the skull was weaker at some point in the past, the bird could not have fed in such a manner. But if the bird didn't feed in such a manner, then why would it have 'evolved' a thicker skull?<ref>http://creation.com/stuart-burgess-interview-biomimetics</ref> [[Liberals]] can't answer questions like this, which is why they resort to silencing the opposition with harassment and vandalism!
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
SkipCaptcha
1,125

edits

Navigation menu