29
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + +
no edit summary
Almost this entire article was copied, originally word-for-word, from http://www.defenders.org/wildlife_and_habitat/wildlife/woodpeckers.php. Copying another person's words, without their permission, without attribution, is deceitful. It is unfortunate that removing the plagiarism reduces the article's length; it will have to be built up again with honest research. [[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:34, 20 May 2010 (EDT)
Almost this entire article was copied, originally word-for-word, from http://www.defenders.org/wildlife_and_habitat/wildlife/woodpeckers.php. Copying another person's words, without their permission, without attribution, is deceitful. It is unfortunate that removing the plagiarism reduces the article's length; it will have to be built up again with honest research. [[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:34, 20 May 2010 (EDT)
What in this[http://creation.com/stuart-burgess-interview-biomimetics] has anything to do with the evolution of the woodpeckers skull? I know it touches on irreducible complexity, but on it's own I don't have anything to do with the subject (woodpeckers). On the other hand, I can't find any sources regarding the evolution of the woodpeckers skull, so the fact the [[Evolutionists]] are silent on the matter might be true.
I'm leaving the link in for now though, since someone might have a good reason for putting it there.
Oh, and I'm removing the "silencing the opposition" part. Might be true, but has nothing to do with woodpeckers :) [[User:SaWi|SaWi]] 07:01, 17 March 2011 (EDT)