Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
32 bytes added ,  19:49, March 17, 2011
m
Line 3: Line 3:     
== Evidence against [[Evolution]] ==
 
== Evidence against [[Evolution]] ==
The skull of the woodpecker is uniquely suited to absorb the intense shocks generated by its feeding habits. If the skull was weaker at some point in the past, the bird would not have been able to feed in such a manner. But if the bird didn't feed in such a manner, then what would have been the reason for it to evolve a thicker skull?<ref>http://creation.com/stuart-burgess-interview-biomimetics</ref> [[Evolutionists]] have not been able to produce an answer to this question.
+
The skull of the woodpecker is uniquely suited to absorb the intense shocks generated by its feeding habits<ref>http://blogs.wsj.com/ideas-market/2011/02/18/woodpecker-skulls-ultimate-shock-absorbers/</ref>. If the skull was weaker at some point in the past, the bird would not have been able to feed in such a manner. But if the bird didn't feed in such a manner, then what would have been the reason for it to evolve a thicker skull? [[Evolutionists]] have not been able to produce an answer to this question.
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
SkipCaptcha
1,125

edits

Navigation menu