| Line 32: |
Line 32: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |7 | | |7 |
| | + | |[http://www.lifesitenews.com/ LifeSiteNews] |
| | + | |a recent addition to this list |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |8 |
| | |[http://www.breitbart.com/ Breitbart] | | |[http://www.breitbart.com/ Breitbart] |
| | |breaks some big stories and exposes [[liberal deceit]] well | | |breaks some big stories and exposes [[liberal deceit]] well |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |8 | + | |9 |
| | |[http://www.redstate.com/ RedState] | | |[http://www.redstate.com/ RedState] |
| | |timely and good volume, with focus on economic, government and election issues | | |timely and good volume, with focus on economic, government and election issues |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |9 | + | |10 |
| | |''[[Washington Times]]'' | | |''[[Washington Times]]'' |
| | |a conservative news source from the nation's capital | | |a conservative news source from the nation's capital |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |10 | + | |11 |
| | |''[[Fox News]]'' | | |''[[Fox News]]'' |
| | |high volume of info, but censors many [[conservative]]s<ref>Conservatives censored (or disparaged) by Fox News include [[Ron Paul]], [[Rand Paul]], [[Pat Buchanan]], Tom Pauken, Rev. Tom Euteneuer, [[Michael Steele]], [[J.D. Hayworth]], [[Steve Lonegan]] and [[Tom Coburn]]; [[Sharron Angle]] has been rarely on Fox News, far less than [[John McCain]] was, even though Angle's race is far more important than McCain's.</ref> and downplays the social issues (for example, see: [[Fox News and homosexuality]]) | | |high volume of info, but censors many [[conservative]]s<ref>Conservatives censored (or disparaged) by Fox News include [[Ron Paul]], [[Rand Paul]], [[Pat Buchanan]], Tom Pauken, Rev. Tom Euteneuer, [[Michael Steele]], [[J.D. Hayworth]], [[Steve Lonegan]] and [[Tom Coburn]]; [[Sharron Angle]] has been rarely on Fox News, far less than [[John McCain]] was, even though Angle's race is far more important than McCain's.</ref> and downplays the social issues (for example, see: [[Fox News and homosexuality]]) |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |11 | + | |12 |
| | |''[[Christian Science Monitor]]'' | | |''[[Christian Science Monitor]]'' |
| | |refreshing in its lack of [[lamestream media]] liberal bias | | |refreshing in its lack of [[lamestream media]] liberal bias |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |12 | + | |13 |
| | |''[[USA Today]]'' | | |''[[USA Today]]'' |
| | |better than the [[lamestream media]] in its reporting on state-by-state news, and its greater balance; but it has been very [[feminist]] and one-sided in its reporting on [[Title IX]] in college sports | | |better than the [[lamestream media]] in its reporting on state-by-state news, and its greater balance; but it has been very [[feminist]] and one-sided in its reporting on [[Title IX]] in college sports |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |13 | + | |14 |
| | |''Orange County Register'' | | |''Orange County Register'' |
| | |the newspaper for the region that once propelled [[Ronald Reagan]] to become the governor of [[California]], and then the [[President]] of the [[United States]] | | |the newspaper for the region that once propelled [[Ronald Reagan]] to become the governor of [[California]], and then the [[President]] of the [[United States]] |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |14 | + | |15 |
| | |''Financial Times'' | | |''Financial Times'' |
| | |more conservative than the [[Wall Street Journal]] | | |more conservative than the [[Wall Street Journal]] |