157
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
introduce myself
I think the main problem with Wikipedia is NPOV (neutral point of view) - in reality, no one can agree on what a neutral point of view is.
I think a much better approach is to have several encyclopedias with competing viewpoints (POVs).
I don't really share Conservapedia's viewpoint, but I don't want to sabotage it either. I think the more POV-specific encyclopedia choices, the better - whether they are my POV or not. Let's have a free market of encyclopedias.
I have written several articles for [http://astorehouseofknowledge.info A Storehouse of Knowledge], I have copied some here when I think they would fit in with this site. I am careful however to only copy what I have written, not any edits by other people. (I am aware that the operator of aSK and this site have had their differences, but I wasn't there and hence have no opinion on those issues.)
I think a much better approach is to have several encyclopedias with competing viewpoints (POVs).
I don't really share Conservapedia's viewpoint, but I don't want to sabotage it either. I think the more POV-specific encyclopedia choices, the better - whether they are my POV or not. Let's have a free market of encyclopedias.
I have written several articles for [http://astorehouseofknowledge.info A Storehouse of Knowledge], I have copied some here when I think they would fit in with this site. I am careful however to only copy what I have written, not any edits by other people. (I am aware that the operator of aSK and this site have had their differences, but I wasn't there and hence have no opinion on those issues.)