Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 bytes removed ,  01:21, April 16, 2011
m
no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:  
At [[Conservapedia]], we have exposed Obama since the beginning. At [[Wikipedia]], the liberal mobocracy has promoted Obama relentlessly at the same time discrediting Bush at every chance. They even have a lengthy page detailing the reasons [[George W. Bush]] should have been impeached. No such page for Obama even though the same bullet points could be crafted; Justification of the invasion, conduct of the war, treatment of detainees, NSA warrantless surveillence, etc. I challenge readers to craft a page on impeaching Obama and see how long it will last. Wikipedia is dishonest, they pretend to be neutral but they are in fact liberal [[partisan]]s.  
 
At [[Conservapedia]], we have exposed Obama since the beginning. At [[Wikipedia]], the liberal mobocracy has promoted Obama relentlessly at the same time discrediting Bush at every chance. They even have a lengthy page detailing the reasons [[George W. Bush]] should have been impeached. No such page for Obama even though the same bullet points could be crafted; Justification of the invasion, conduct of the war, treatment of detainees, NSA warrantless surveillence, etc. I challenge readers to craft a page on impeaching Obama and see how long it will last. Wikipedia is dishonest, they pretend to be neutral but they are in fact liberal [[partisan]]s.  
   −
Of the 2 million query results for 'impeach Obama' pages on [[Google]], I am counting on a high listing in search results. An impeach Obama article is bound to increase page views at Conservapedia and fits in well with all the different Obama's pages exclusively created here. We don't censor the truth.
+
Of the 2 million query results for 'impeach Obama' pages on [[Google]], I am counting on a high listing in search results. An impeach Obama article is bound to increase page views at Conservapedia and fits in well with all the different Obama pages exclusively created here. We don't censor the truth.
    
[[Impeachment]], like treason, is from a byegone era when the public demanded integrity and honesty from their leaders. The impeachment of [[Bill Clinton]] was a joke. A sitting President lies to the nation, than lies under oath in court. A Republican [[House]] & [[Senate]] could not remove him from office. Today, we have a [[Republican]] House and a [[Democrat]] Senate. Impeachment is a loser of an idea that will go nowhere. But it begs a greater question, at what point does the [[President]] cross the line that gets him removed from office? Obama is pursuing a scorched [[Earth]] policy regarding the [[Constitution]]. When do we deem the President a threat to the Republic? After we determine his limits under the Constitution, what is our next step? An in-depth public discussion is needed.  
 
[[Impeachment]], like treason, is from a byegone era when the public demanded integrity and honesty from their leaders. The impeachment of [[Bill Clinton]] was a joke. A sitting President lies to the nation, than lies under oath in court. A Republican [[House]] & [[Senate]] could not remove him from office. Today, we have a [[Republican]] House and a [[Democrat]] Senate. Impeachment is a loser of an idea that will go nowhere. But it begs a greater question, at what point does the [[President]] cross the line that gets him removed from office? Obama is pursuing a scorched [[Earth]] policy regarding the [[Constitution]]. When do we deem the President a threat to the Republic? After we determine his limits under the Constitution, what is our next step? An in-depth public discussion is needed.  
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682

edits

Navigation menu