1,129
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 01:29, April 5, 2007
, 01:29, April 5, 2007→...and about the math...
::Wikipedia has its internal icons who are looked to for guidance in varrying fields of specialization. For as long as I've been involved in the project, there's been a desire from the highest levels to create a Conservaitve spokesperson, one widely viewed moreless as the Bill Buckley of Conservapedia wiki editors. Of course this has been about as successful as the NHL signing Black hockey players. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:17, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
::Wikipedia has its internal icons who are looked to for guidance in varrying fields of specialization. For as long as I've been involved in the project, there's been a desire from the highest levels to create a Conservaitve spokesperson, one widely viewed moreless as the Bill Buckley of Conservapedia wiki editors. Of course this has been about as successful as the NHL signing Black hockey players. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:17, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
::: Those numbers are ''self selected'' meaning that they are completely and totally useless for any sort of comparison. Self selected surveys are junk - misleading at best.[http://www.aapor.org/pdfs/2006/samp_err_stmt.pdf] --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 21:29, 4 April 2007 (EDT)