Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:  
So no explanation of how opposing regulation of media (which is what opposition to pornography would necessarily require) is a liberal viewpoint, simply the statement that it is de facto the case without a lick of evidence to back it up.  Marvelous.  Your book deal with Regnery is a shoe in now sir.   
 
So no explanation of how opposing regulation of media (which is what opposition to pornography would necessarily require) is a liberal viewpoint, simply the statement that it is de facto the case without a lick of evidence to back it up.  Marvelous.  Your book deal with Regnery is a shoe in now sir.   
 
--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 20:32, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
 
--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 20:32, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Rex, do you accept the notion of "correlation"?  The correlation between liberals and less regulation of porn is very high.  This isn't opinion.  This can be easily seen by voting records and court decisions.  It can be shown scientifically as easily as, say, the correlation between smoking and lung cancer. --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:39, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
    
== ...and about the math... ==
 
== ...and about the math... ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,393

edits

Navigation menu