Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)

Revision as of 02:15, May 6, 2011

No change in size ,  02:15, May 6, 2011
→‎Disclaimer added to the top of the page informing readers that relativity has been proven capable of prediction and scientific accuracy: corrected: 35 counterexamples
Line 11: Line 11:  
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/05/science/space/05gravity.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/05/science/space/05gravity.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
   −
:Please explain what you think is so persuasive about that article, or how it addresses any of the 32 counterexamples.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:22, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
+
:Please explain what you think is so persuasive about that article, or how it addresses any of the 35 counterexamples.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:22, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
    
::If you please, Mark, try quoting the actual scientific journal instead of the New York Times.  Wikipedia is also not a source.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 21:31, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
 
::If you please, Mark, try quoting the actual scientific journal instead of the New York Times.  Wikipedia is also not a source.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 21:31, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/866822"

Navigation menu