1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 20:29, May 6, 2011
, 20:29, May 6, 2011→Disclaimer added to the top of the page informing readers that relativity has been proven capable of prediction and scientific accuracy: add link for project page
::If you please, Mark, try quoting the actual scientific journal instead of the New York Times. Wikipedia is also not a source. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 21:31, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
::If you please, Mark, try quoting the actual scientific journal instead of the New York Times. Wikipedia is also not a source. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 21:31, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
::: According to the project web page, they have links for press coverage, but not yet a link for a scientific paper. [http://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/status1.html] This experiment was done in 2005, and abandoned as inconclusive by NASA in 2008. It will be interesting to see how they managed to reinterpret the data when the paper appears. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:29, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
== Counter-example removed because of the experiment listed above ==
== Counter-example removed because of the experiment listed above ==