Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)

Revision as of 01:06, May 7, 2011

426 bytes added ,  01:06, May 7, 2011
→‎New claim of proof of Relativity???: It will also be interesting to see if this new paper plays the same trick that was used to award a Nobel Prize to the binary pulsar work.
Line 7: Line 7:  
----
 
----
   −
== Disclaimer added to the top of the page informing readers that relativity ''has'' been proven capable of prediction and scientific accuracy ==
+
== New claim of proof of Relativity??? ==
 
The results of the experiment can be found here:
 
The results of the experiment can be found here:
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/05/science/space/05gravity.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/05/science/space/05gravity.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
Line 16: Line 16:     
::: According to the project web page, they have links for press coverage, but not yet a link for a scientific paper. [http://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/status1.html] This experiment was done in 2005, and abandoned as inconclusive by NASA in 2008. It will be interesting to see how they managed to reinterpret the data when the paper appears. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:29, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
 
::: According to the project web page, they have links for press coverage, but not yet a link for a scientific paper. [http://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/status1.html] This experiment was done in 2005, and abandoned as inconclusive by NASA in 2008. It will be interesting to see how they managed to reinterpret the data when the paper appears. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:29, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::It will also be interesting to see if this new paper plays the same trick that was used to award a Nobel Prize to the binary pulsar work.  There the reasoning was that key physical values could be assumed that would make the data fit predictions of [[Relativity]].  See [[PSR B1913+16]].  The trouble was that subsequent, new data observed after the prize was awarded probably began to confound the assumed values, because scientists stopped publishing the new data!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:06, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
    
== Counter-example removed because of the experiment listed above ==
 
== Counter-example removed because of the experiment listed above ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/867038"

Navigation menu