nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 106:
Line 106: +
→needless revert: Consequence, not reason.
:::'For example, Jesus referred to the writings of Moses. So if Moses didn't write them, Jesus was wrong.' Ah, now there's a point (albeit a very old one based, as usual, on backward reasoning that attempts to derive fact from belief) - and what might ''that'' suggest, I wonder? Follow the logic! --[[User:Petrus|Petrus]] 05:35, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
:::'For example, Jesus referred to the writings of Moses. So if Moses didn't write them, Jesus was wrong.' Ah, now there's a point (albeit a very old one based, as usual, on backward reasoning that attempts to derive fact from belief) - and what might ''that'' suggest, I wonder? Follow the logic! --[[User:Petrus|Petrus]] 05:35, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
::::That was not meant as a line of reasoning, but as an explanation of the consequences. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:37, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
== Question on text ==
== Question on text ==