Changes

::While that may be true, with the text given, it was unrelated to the article at hand. It started out mentioning the humans and dinosuar thing, then suddenly goes into something about how some guy had trouble getting on and off a fake dinosuar. And I would state it with "atheism and poor health have many demonstrated links" possibly followed by references to them. We aren't (Atleast I was not) trying to censor anything, just... confused is a good word, over the picture and the point it was making. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 23:02, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

::While that may be true, with the text given, it was unrelated to the article at hand. It started out mentioning the humans and dinosuar thing, then suddenly goes into something about how some guy had trouble getting on and off a fake dinosuar. And I would state it with "atheism and poor health have many demonstrated links" possibly followed by references to them. We aren't (Atleast I was not) trying to censor anything, just... confused is a good word, over the picture and the point it was making. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 23:02, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

::Of course not. But I believe, everything should have its proper place. I noticed that there are dedicated pages for atheist-related humor. Why not put it there. An article that aims to be taken seriously should present itself as such. -[[User:MejiaS|MejiaS]] 00:03, 14 May 2011 (EDT)

::Of course not. But I believe, everything should have its proper place. I noticed that there are dedicated pages for atheist-related humor. Why not put it there? An article that aims to be taken seriously should present itself as such. -[[User:MejiaS|MejiaS]] 00:03, 14 May 2011 (EDT)

:::Humor and satire have a variety of forms, and do not lend themselves to copy-editing.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:41, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

:::Humor and satire have a variety of forms, and do not lend themselves to copy-editing.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:41, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

::::What about copy editing? and yah, they do. But the point of the asking for it;s removal (and my subsequent removal) was that it was out of place with only a vague and flimsy reasoning for it to be aat that spot. I'm just curious about the justification is all ^_^--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 23:44, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

::::What about copy editing? and yah, they do. But the point of the asking for it;s removal (and my subsequent removal) was that it was out of place with only a vague and flimsy reasoning for it to be aat that spot. I'm just curious about the justification is all ^_^--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 23:44, 13 May 2011 (EDT)