Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 327:
Line 327: + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 04:06, May 14, 2011
, 04:06, May 14, 2011→Picture of PZ Myers: reply
:::Humor and satire have a variety of forms, and do not lend themselves to copy-editing.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:41, 13 May 2011 (EDT)
:::Humor and satire have a variety of forms, and do not lend themselves to copy-editing.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:41, 13 May 2011 (EDT)
::::What about copy editing? and yah, they do. But the point of the asking for it;s removal (and my subsequent removal) was that it was out of place with only a vague and flimsy reasoning for it to be aat that spot. I'm just curious about the justification is all ^_^--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 23:44, 13 May 2011 (EDT)
::::What about copy editing? and yah, they do. But the point of the asking for it;s removal (and my subsequent removal) was that it was out of place with only a vague and flimsy reasoning for it to be aat that spot. I'm just curious about the justification is all ^_^--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 23:44, 13 May 2011 (EDT)
:::::Often non sequiturs are the essence of humor. Perhaps it's the humor itself that some object to?
:::::At a Hollywood-type gathering earlier this year, where mocking people who are more conservative than the performers has long been customary, the emcee mocked the performers themselves instead, and they were furious about it. Double standard?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:06, 14 May 2011 (EDT)