Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + +
Debate:Should the loser of debates be blocked? (view source)
Revision as of 19:11, May 26, 2011
, 19:11, May 26, 2011no edit summary
{{debate}}
{{debate}}
Conservapedia has many debates, with intelligent discussion, however I think that there needs to be a rule like the 9/10 rule that says that if the original creator of a debate looses the debate, they will be blocked. Like the 9/10 rule, it is intended to keep Conservapedia from having endless discussion, and that the person who starts a debate page should think first before starting another useless debate. It will definitely cut down on the liberal troll debates that aren't really serious, but are made just to get a reaction out of people, and that is why I think this rule will succeed. Perhaps the person who starts and loses the debate shouldn't get blocked the first time, but maybe if they lose 2/3 or so of them, then they get blocked. --[[User:BriellaRollert|BriellaRollert]] 15:02, 26 May 2011 (EDT)
Conservapedia has many debates, with intelligent discussion, however I think that there needs to be a rule like the 9/10 rule that says that if the original creator of a debate looses the debate, they will be blocked. Like the 9/10 rule, it is intended to keep Conservapedia from having endless discussion, and that the person who starts a debate page should think first before starting another useless debate. It will definitely cut down on the liberal troll debates that aren't really serious, but are made just to get a reaction out of people, and that is why I think this rule will succeed. Perhaps the person who starts and loses the debate shouldn't get blocked the first time, but maybe if they lose 2/3 or so of them, then they get blocked. --[[User:BriellaRollert|BriellaRollert]] 15:02, 26 May 2011 (EDT)
==No==
People who get blocked from this site are those that deliberately cause trouble, raise hate and discontent, commit vandalism, harassment, and so on. Losing a debate - as opposed to an endless debate for debate's sake - is not one of those reasons. I'd rather the price for losing a debate would be for the losing party to take their favorite lady out to dinner rather than a block. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:11, 26 May 2011 (EDT)