27
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: +
Debate:Should the loser of debates be blocked? (view source)
Revision as of 18:44, May 29, 2011
, 18:44, May 29, 2011→No
==No==
==No==
People who get blocked from this site are those that deliberately cause trouble, raise hate and discontent, commit vandalism, harassment, and so on. Losing a debate - as opposed to an endless debate for debate's sake - is not one of those reasons. I'd rather the price for losing a debate would be for the losing party to take their favorite lady out to dinner rather than a block. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:11, 26 May 2011 (EDT)
People who get blocked from this site are those that deliberately cause trouble, raise hate and discontent, commit vandalism, harassment, and so on. Losing a debate - as opposed to an endless debate for debate's sake - is not one of those reasons. I'd rather the price for losing a debate would be for the losing party to take their favorite lady out to dinner rather than a block. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:11, 26 May 2011 (EDT)
:OK, but what about people who repeatedly bring up debate topics purely to make people angry, rather than to actually debate something. The punishment for vandalism leaves a loophole in for debates, and don't you think we should keep people from taking advantage of that?--[[User:BriellaRollert|BriellaRollert]] 14:44, 29 May 2011 (EDT)