Changes

#Some editors like Conservative and those editing the "in the news" section, on the main page, have had excellent success taking atheists to task.  We should keep it up, and step it up.  There are so many good targets it is a little intimidating.  But if anyone has ideas as to where a blow would really hurt...

#Some editors like Conservative and those editing the "in the news" section, on the main page, have had excellent success taking atheists to task.  We should keep it up, and step it up.  There are so many good targets it is a little intimidating.  But if anyone has ideas as to where a blow would really hurt...

#We could to do more to go after media companies who promote liberal and anti-Christian values.

#We could to do more to go after media companies who promote liberal and anti-Christian values.

#Post liberal assertions and refute them.  That way, whenever someone inserts a liberal talking point into an article, another editor refutes that point.  Simply reverting such edits only arouses cries of "censorship!" and lends credence to the liberal world view.  Naturally, we do not want to fall victim to the balance fallacy, but we must also consider that on occasion opposing viewpoints may need to be taken seriously, if not for ourselves then for others to learn from.

#Post liberal assertions and refute them.  That way, whenever someone inserts a liberal talking point into an article, another editor refutes that point.  Simply reverting such edits only arouses cries of "censorship!" and lends credence to the liberal world view.  Naturally, we do not want to fall victim to the [[false balance|balance fallacy]], but we must also consider that on occasion opposing viewpoints may need to be taken seriously, if not for ourselves then for others to learn from.