3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 366:
Line 366: − +
→Conservapedia's inaccuracy is disgusting...period
== Conservapedia's inaccuracy is disgusting...period ==
== Conservapedia's inaccuracy is disgusting...period ==
The content of this page is offensive. How can someone attempt to mislead his readers this badly? There is no factual base to this article, and thus, it has no value. I have read previous posts about the page being locked because of "vandalism" of the page. I find that funny, considering this page could not be more butchered or inaccurate than it already is. Anyone who writes this, and honestly believes it to be true, should be admitted to a ward. --Young 6pm 6/17/11
The content of this page is offensive. How can someone attempt to mislead his readers this badly? There is no factual base to this article, and thus, it has no value. I have read previous posts about the page being locked because of "vandalism" of the page. I find that funny, considering this page could not be more butchered or inaccurate than it already is. Anyone who writes this, and honestly believes it to be true, should be admitted to a ward. --[[User:Young|Young]] 18:03, 17 June 2011 (EDT)