Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
574
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 363:
Line 363: − − == Conservapedia's inaccuracy is disgusting...period == − − The content of this page is offensive. How can someone attempt to mislead his readers this badly? There is no factual base to this article, and thus, it has no value. I have read previous posts about the page being locked because of "vandalism" of the page. I find that funny, considering this page could not be more butchered or inaccurate than it already is. Anyone who writes this, and honestly believes it to be true, should be admitted to a ward. --[[User:Young|Young]] 18:03, 17 June 2011 (EDT)
no edit summary
WBC as a liberal organization not just a ridiculous idea, but an outright falsehood. Any political stance by the Phelps family should be construed as being outside the general political spectrum. The idea of WBC as an even further "hyper" extension of liberalism is just as wrong. Seeing as how some fundamental tenants of being a liberal, according to this article, are supporting same-sex marriage and political correctness, the maintenance of internal consistency, if nothing else, requires an unlocking of this page and removing the WBC from this list of liberal organizations. [[User:Corry|Corry]] 15:31, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
WBC as a liberal organization not just a ridiculous idea, but an outright falsehood. Any political stance by the Phelps family should be construed as being outside the general political spectrum. The idea of WBC as an even further "hyper" extension of liberalism is just as wrong. Seeing as how some fundamental tenants of being a liberal, according to this article, are supporting same-sex marriage and political correctness, the maintenance of internal consistency, if nothing else, requires an unlocking of this page and removing the WBC from this list of liberal organizations. [[User:Corry|Corry]] 15:31, 1 July 2008 (EDT)