Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,468
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 420:
Line 420: − − ==NO, this site is nothing more than a place for hateful people to get together and slander their opponents== − − This site is exactly what liberals can attack. For the most part it is uncivil, unsourced and unencyclopedic. Every page on this site attacks liberals with unreasonable personal attacks like calling them fat. Seriously guys? Atheism and obesity is a page? If you want to be taken seriously you need to take the high road not sling mud. Sure the articles can have a conservative slant but this is whole website is just a hateful meeting place of frustrated people. How about you attack liberal policies with logical arguments on how the conservative approach is better for america rather than just calling liberals pedophiles and heathens. Or maybe the only reason you resort to this slander is because you do not have any arguments that can hold water. Everything on wikipedia is sourced and backed up by research and news reports, not opinions. If fact checking is a liberal bias than your whole platform sucks and relies on the uneducated voting against their own interests. --[[User:Imagine|Imagine]] 15:17, 22 June 2011 (EDT)
Debate:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced? (view source)
Revision as of 15:24, June 23, 2011
, 15:24, June 23, 2011Reverted edits by Imagine (talk) to last revision by Conservative
:::King, re: atheism and obesity: A few atheists? I suggest you return to grammar school and relearn how to count. It appears as though you want to play the fallacy of exclusion game and leave it all the relevant data I provided concerning the very religious plus deal with all the data I gave concerning atheists. You are not fooling anyone. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 22:43, 9 May 2011 (EDT)
:::King, re: atheism and obesity: A few atheists? I suggest you return to grammar school and relearn how to count. It appears as though you want to play the fallacy of exclusion game and leave it all the relevant data I provided concerning the very religious plus deal with all the data I gave concerning atheists. You are not fooling anyone. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 22:43, 9 May 2011 (EDT)
:::King, please cite one factual error or one false claim I made in the article. You can't! :) I have decided to end the discussion on this page as it appears as if it will be unproductive. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 23:07, 9 May 2011 (EDT)
:::King, please cite one factual error or one false claim I made in the article. You can't! :) I have decided to end the discussion on this page as it appears as if it will be unproductive. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 23:07, 9 May 2011 (EDT)