Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
297 bytes added ,  18:31, June 23, 2011
m
no edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:     
I find the claim of "Devolution" to be a dubious one anyway because the adaptation is clearly beneficial for MRSA as it allows it to survive in its environment more effectively. I think it should be removed, does anyone have any objections?
 
I find the claim of "Devolution" to be a dubious one anyway because the adaptation is clearly beneficial for MRSA as it allows it to survive in its environment more effectively. I think it should be removed, does anyone have any objections?
 +
 +
:I've fixed the reference to include author/title/ISBN - something you could very easily have done. I haven't read the book so I can't comment on what it says on this point, but your opinion that it's 'dubious' isn't a reason to remove the information. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 14:31, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
574

edits

Navigation menu