19
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: + + + +
→Second source (RE: Evolution)
:I've fixed the reference to include author/title/ISBN - something you could very easily have done. I haven't read the book so I can't comment on what it says on this point, but your opinion that it's 'dubious' isn't a reason to remove the information. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 14:31, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
:I've fixed the reference to include author/title/ISBN - something you could very easily have done. I haven't read the book so I can't comment on what it says on this point, but your opinion that it's 'dubious' isn't a reason to remove the information. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 14:31, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
:: You're right, I could have changed it very easily. But I didn't want to take the responsibility because I also haven't read the book, so I wasn't sure I would have been referencing material that actually think is worthy of citation. I was half hoping the author of this page who probably read the book could elaborate on it. If you're confident enough to make the change though, then that's fine and I apologise.
Also, regarding devolution, I think that resistance to antibiotics is the absolute opposite of devolution as it is a beneficial adaptation. If you think I don't have grounds to make the claim then that's fine, as I said if anyone has any objections that I'll at least leave it open for debate.[[User:SecularConservative|SecularConservative]] 22:18, 23 June 2011 (BST)