Changes

I think the main problem with Wikipedia is NPOV (neutral point of view) - in reality, no one can agree on what a neutral point of view is.

<nowiki>I think the main problem with Wikipedia is NPOV (neutral point of view) - in reality, no one can agree on what a neutral point of view is.

I think a much better approach is to have several encyclopedias with competing viewpoints (POVs).

I think a much better approach is to have several encyclopedias with competing viewpoints (POVs).

I have written several articles for [http://astorehouseofknowledge.info A Storehouse of Knowledge], I have copied some here when I think they would fit in with this site. I am careful however to only copy what I have written, not any edits by other people.

I have written several articles for [http://astorehouseofknowledge.info A Storehouse of Knowledge], I have copied some here when I think they would fit in with this site. I am careful however to only copy what I have written, not any edits by other people.

I identify as a religious liberal; but one thing I do have in common with many Conservapedia editors, is a disagreement with atheism, especially organized atheism. So I am hopeful I can contribute positively to articles on the topic of atheism.

I identify as a religious liberal; but one thing I do have in common with many Conservapedia editors, is a disagreement with atheism, especially organized atheism. So I am hopeful I can contribute positively to articles on the topic of atheism.</nowiki>