24
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: +
→NPOV
::::Tea Party are activists? That would imply they have some legitimate complaint and are not just a racist mob of rabble rousers. I'm not sure I understand. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:30, 9 July 2011 (EDT)
::::Tea Party are activists? That would imply they have some legitimate complaint and are not just a racist mob of rabble rousers. I'm not sure I understand. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:30, 9 July 2011 (EDT)
:::::Ha ha. Here's a link, there are plenty more: [http://www.teapartyactivists.com/]. [[User:BobJ|BobJ]] 13:36, 9 July 2011 (EDT)
:::::Ha ha. Here's a link, there are plenty more: [http://www.teapartyactivists.com/]. [[User:BobJ|BobJ]] 13:36, 9 July 2011 (EDT)
:::::Also, here's a quote from him, from one of the sources used in this article: "Phelps said Gore 'was the icon of the '''conservative''' faction of the Democratic Party' when he came to Kansas in 1988' (emphasis mine). "'He was strong pro-life, and he said he wasn't going to accept any money from homosexual groups, and things of that nature,' Phelps said. 'But there's no question in my mind that approximately in the late 1980s or the early 1990s he made a conscious decision that he wanted to be a successful national candidate, and he sold out on some of those critical social issues, because that's what he had to do to succeed nationally in the Democratic Party.' Doesn't exactly sound liberal. [[User:BobJ|BobJ]] 13:41, 9 July 2011 (EDT)