Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,100
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + + + + +
→moved yout two cents to the better talk page: new section
:I'm not clear on what all may be considered a 'minor edit', despite what I have read in the guidelines. [[User:PatternOfPersona|PatternOfPersona]] 23:31, 9 June 2011 (EDT)
:I'm not clear on what all may be considered a 'minor edit', despite what I have read in the guidelines. [[User:PatternOfPersona|PatternOfPersona]] 23:31, 9 June 2011 (EDT)
:As for doing all my edits in one post, I will endeavor to do so from now on. But, I'm not sure that such a method will not extremely limit the level of contributions I can make, since my brain functions in such atypical ways that I may not be able to think nearly as well about the text and subject of a given article by such a method. It has to do with mental images that my brain accepts as having been set in the public domain, and in the particular simple formats and colors of a wiki. I do have the ability to do word-processing on my own machine, but my brain does not handle such texts to nearly the dynamic degree as it does 'live' public opensource encyclopedic text. :) [[User:PatternOfPersona|PatternOfPersona]] 23:04, 9 June 2011 (EDT)
:As for doing all my edits in one post, I will endeavor to do so from now on. But, I'm not sure that such a method will not extremely limit the level of contributions I can make, since my brain functions in such atypical ways that I may not be able to think nearly as well about the text and subject of a given article by such a method. It has to do with mental images that my brain accepts as having been set in the public domain, and in the particular simple formats and colors of a wiki. I do have the ability to do word-processing on my own machine, but my brain does not handle such texts to nearly the dynamic degree as it does 'live' public opensource encyclopedic text. :) [[User:PatternOfPersona|PatternOfPersona]] 23:04, 9 June 2011 (EDT)
== moved yout two cents to the better talk page ==
moved yout two cents to the better talk page
In psychological/social terms, atheism is defined as the negation of the most basic good sentiments that it is logically possible to have: good sentiments toward a good, overseeing Creator God. So, life is not about atheism. Which means atheism (especially strong atheism) is not an actual quality of good character, but, at best, a lack of certain good character. The fact that many theists are arrogant does not mean that theism is arrogance, but that theists tend to be fallen humans. Theism does not preclude arrogance on the part of the theist in terms of theism, but, neither does atheism preclude arrogance on the part of the atheist in terms of atheism.PatternOfPersona 19:54, 3 July 2011 (EDT) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:14, 15 July 2011 (EDT)