Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,123
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: − +
→moved your two cents to the better talk page
== moved your two cents to the better talk page ==
== moved your two cents to the better talk page ==
moved yout two cents to the better talk page
moved yout two cents to the better talk page located [[Talk:Essay: Ponies vs. atheism - Ponies win|HERE]]
In psychological/social terms, atheism is defined as the negation of the most basic good sentiments that it is logically possible to have: good sentiments toward a good, overseeing Creator God. So, life is not about atheism. Which means atheism (especially strong atheism) is not an actual quality of good character, but, at best, a lack of certain good character. The fact that many theists are arrogant does not mean that theism is arrogance, but that theists tend to be fallen humans. Theism does not preclude arrogance on the part of the theist in terms of theism, but, neither does atheism preclude arrogance on the part of the atheist in terms of atheism.PatternOfPersona 19:54, 3 July 2011 (EDT) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:14, 15 July 2011 (EDT)
In psychological/social terms, atheism is defined as the negation of the most basic good sentiments that it is logically possible to have: good sentiments toward a good, overseeing Creator God. So, life is not about atheism. Which means atheism (especially strong atheism) is not an actual quality of good character, but, at best, a lack of certain good character. The fact that many theists are arrogant does not mean that theism is arrogance, but that theists tend to be fallen humans. Theism does not preclude arrogance on the part of the theist in terms of theism, but, neither does atheism preclude arrogance on the part of the atheist in terms of atheism.PatternOfPersona 19:54, 3 July 2011 (EDT) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:14, 15 July 2011 (EDT)