Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,038
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 17:
Line 17: + +
Talk:Creation vs. evolution debates (view source)
Revision as of 22:09, July 23, 2011
, 22:09, July 23, 2011→Article title
:That's a good suggestion. We could merge it into [[Atheism and Debate]], maybe put it in a section called "[[Atheism and Debate#Creation_Scientists_Tend_to_Win_the_Creation-Evolution_Debates|Creation Scientists Tend to Win the Creation-Evolution Debates]]". ...oh, wait. ;) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:37, 23 July 2011 (EDT)
:That's a good suggestion. We could merge it into [[Atheism and Debate]], maybe put it in a section called "[[Atheism and Debate#Creation_Scientists_Tend_to_Win_the_Creation-Evolution_Debates|Creation Scientists Tend to Win the Creation-Evolution Debates]]". ...oh, wait. ;) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:37, 23 July 2011 (EDT)
:::I have emailed the website owner and some fellow Sysops to keep the article, keep it locked, and to overly react to evolutionists opposition. I don't see a point in caving into atheist/evolutionists opposition for this important article nor do I see a point in engaging in wheel spinning. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:42, 23 July 2011 (EDT)
:::I have emailed the website owner and some fellow Sysops to keep the article, keep it locked, and to overly react to evolutionists opposition. I don't see a point in caving into atheist/evolutionists opposition for this important article nor do I see a point in engaging in wheel spinning. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:42, 23 July 2011 (EDT)
:::::Right now the big concern was over deleted and oversighted talk page discussions. User:Conservative said he wasn't responsible, and I believe him. Certainly trolling, foul language, abusive comments should be reverted and in extreme cases oversighted, but not wholesale deleting and oversighting of Archive discussions. Reader feedback & suggestions for improvement are a good thing.
:::::On a side note to User:Conservative, sorry I wasn't able to get back to you on our private correspondance. You and I are a lot alike, tuff skin, able to shake off intemperate and immoderate remarks directed at us, bullets bounce off our chests. Good to see you still standing on your feet! [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:09, 23 July 2011 (EDT)
::::Oh no, I am not an evolutionist. This is a great article, and I think it should be kept. All I am suggesting is perhaps putting this info as part of another article, or perhaps find a better name. This is not a problem with the content, just the aesthetics of the title (and the fact that it is difficult for someone like me to search for). I appologize if my request came the wrong way. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:44, 23 July 2011 (EDT)
::::Oh no, I am not an evolutionist. This is a great article, and I think it should be kept. All I am suggesting is perhaps putting this info as part of another article, or perhaps find a better name. This is not a problem with the content, just the aesthetics of the title (and the fact that it is difficult for someone like me to search for). I appologize if my request came the wrong way. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:44, 23 July 2011 (EDT)
:::Nick, thanks. Some of this information is incorporated into 3-5 Conservapedia articles including [[Atheism and Debate]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:50, 23 July 2011 (EDT)
:::Nick, thanks. Some of this information is incorporated into 3-5 Conservapedia articles including [[Atheism and Debate]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:50, 23 July 2011 (EDT)