| | :::Nick, thanks. Some of this information is incorporated into 3-5 Conservapedia articles including [[Atheism and Debate]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:50, 23 July 2011 (EDT) | | :::Nick, thanks. Some of this information is incorporated into 3-5 Conservapedia articles including [[Atheism and Debate]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:50, 23 July 2011 (EDT) |
| | ::::No problem. I'm glad I could point that out. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:53, 23 July 2011 (EDT) | | ::::No problem. I'm glad I could point that out. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:53, 23 July 2011 (EDT) |
| | I know it mentions Shock of God, but I have closely observed his channel, and there are plenty of examples of him winning debates against atheists. I remember a specific debate (I can't find it at the moment, but I'll try), where the atheists simply refused to even respond to his points, and then just claimed the themselves as the winner. Despite the fact that they invited Shock on to debate with them, they refused to even debate his famous question and instead focused on something completely irrelevent (I believe it had to do with the idea that Christianity is based off of Paul, not Jesus's, teachings. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:52, 23 July 2011 (EDT) | | I know it mentions Shock of God, but I have closely observed his channel, and there are plenty of examples of him winning debates against atheists. I remember a specific debate (I can't find it at the moment, but I'll try), where the atheists simply refused to even respond to his points, and then just claimed the themselves as the winner. Despite the fact that they invited Shock on to debate with them, they refused to even debate his famous question and instead focused on something completely irrelevent (I believe it had to do with the idea that Christianity is based off of Paul, not Jesus's, teachings. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:52, 23 July 2011 (EDT) |