Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎References: new section
Line 10: Line 10:  
I like the idea of the graphic, however I cannot read the current graphic.  I do not know if this is isolated to me, or if perhaps we could find a better one that has the text for what the graphic is illustrated still on it, as the legend appears to be missing.  --[[User:MRellek|MRellek]] 21:23, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
 
I like the idea of the graphic, however I cannot read the current graphic.  I do not know if this is isolated to me, or if perhaps we could find a better one that has the text for what the graphic is illustrated still on it, as the legend appears to be missing.  --[[User:MRellek|MRellek]] 21:23, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
 
: The above issue was fixed almost immediately.  --[[User:MRellek|MRellek]] 21:29, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
 
: The above issue was fixed almost immediately.  --[[User:MRellek|MRellek]] 21:29, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== References ==
 +
 +
There needs to be a lot more cites added to this article before it's ready to be featured. There are many statements (and indeed, whole paragraphs) that are unreferenced. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 11:42, 28 July 2011 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
1,924

edits

Navigation menu