Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
907
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 695:
Line 695: +
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 05:53, July 30, 2011
, 05:53, July 30, 2011→Policies that need to die: Editorial Authority
:I absolutely and completely agree with you, Sid 3050. This rule needs a '''''lot''''' of clarification. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 15:15, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
:I absolutely and completely agree with you, Sid 3050. This rule needs a '''''lot''''' of clarification. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 15:15, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
::I think that the 2 week block was too harsh, but I disagree with the idea that the rule should be revoked. Administrators are supposed to be chosen for their judgement, and there's nothing wrong with requiring some discussion beforehand--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 00:02, 30 July 2011 (EDT)
::I think that the 2 week block was too harsh, but I disagree with the idea that the rule should be revoked. Administrators are supposed to be chosen for their judgement, and there's nothing wrong with requiring some discussion beforehand--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 00:02, 30 July 2011 (EDT)
:::I agree completely, and I firmly believe that this is CP's biggest flaw. Admins should not be considered as having a greater say editorially than other editors. A wiki is a collaborative endeavour and this rule completely inverts this process and turns editors right off. I know it turns people off because I remember once hammering out a compromise on some (minor) articles talkpage with various people about how an article should begin, only to have an admin come in and tell us that our input was not required. My editing slowed right down after that. If you want to run a blog, then run a blog, if you want a wiki then lets have a wiki. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:53, 30 July 2011 (EDT)